« EMC World 2012: big reveal on the band :-) | Main | EMC Virtual Storage Integrator 5.2 now available »

March 29, 2012


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


Excellent post, I want the right answer too for configuring MPIO on EMC AX4-5i with vSphere or normal VM with iSCSI.

Brandon Riley

>>"our customers want and need this information, and frankly often add as much to the dialog as we do."

I cannot emphasize enough how right you are on this one. As a customer, I am so frustrated by the incoherent strategy when it comes to information or recommendations. The documentation is plentiful, but often quite disorganized. As an example, I had to look at 5 different documents just yesterday to try and piece together how the SRA utilities for VSI works, and I STILL never found anything that said this HAS to be installed directly on the SRM server to work.

Often times, I'm tweeting in desperation, and the links sent in response are inaccessible to me on Powerlink. This really makes life as a customer difficult.

One last thing. My EMC sales experience, as I detailed on my blog, was second to none. Not one other vendor even came within striking distance in that regard. The post-purchase experience has been nightmarish. A huge reason for my trauma has been the disheveled, inconsistent recommendations coming from implementation engineers, EMC curriculum, and even support personnel. I won't go into detail here, but I will say that if it weren't for my awesome salesperson being willing to put my questions out to your internal social network, my frustration level would be 5x higher.

So yes. Customers want this information. We want consistent, credible information from people who know what they're talking about. Thanks for the post. I've been needing to vent this to someone who will listen for months.

Jim Millard

My approach to these sort of internal conversations is to get the customer problem solved, then blog about the situation in the generic/abstract voice. In a team effort, this requires someone to take the initiative to get it done for each circumstance. I'm sure that Chad has no shortage of folks who can "tidy up" an email thread into an informative post that ultimately gets scraped--and is therefore searchable--by Google and the other search platforms. The hard part is making sure it gets done in a timely fashion: the sooner it surfaces, the sooner it can be searchable.

Terry Jones

Chad - Thought provoking as ever. Do you ever ask easy questions?

In my mind this is a case of 'be careful what you wish for'

Organisations I have worked for have struggled with this since the advent of the social web. As it is so easy to publish and share information the expectation of organisations such as EMC and VMware is that we should do so without limitations. The simple thing would seemingly be to do exactly that..


My experience of working on the inside is that the pool of knowledge is huge and for any given topic or question you can always find a number of divergent opinions/answers, the trick is then to know how to assess the provenance of the information i.e If its a question on SRM then Chad's answer is the one I would go with :-) . With open access to data of this type the external party has to make the call….

Of course the danger lies not with the individual who is working diligently and in a vast majority of cases will take the information in the spirit in which it was intended, but with their employer who suffers an outage as a result of a well-intentioned mis-interpretation and starts looking for someone to blame.

At a past employer we gave some key distributor personnel access to our internal KB as this was seen as a way of making them more self sufficient and responsive. They realised that by becoming the arbiter of what was correct they were exposing themselves to risk and there were few complaints when the experiment ended.

As you infer, the decision the supplier has to take is if the goodwill (and $$$) such openness drives is worth the pain it can bring along with it. Unfortunately I suspect that question that will keep the lawyers and accountants busy for a good while!

(VMware employee, but the above is a general point….)

Michael Ryom

Put it all you there(as long as it makes sense and legal and all that)! Was looking for an EMC storage appliance the other day, know you made one, but powerlink and google search didn't do it for me... So when with 'free nas'... A small example of how hard it can be and how easy it is to find some one else who will provide it.

For EMC customers a good start would be to clean up powerlink. Haven't really used 'everything xxx @emc' but its a good start and a very good way of getting the knowhow out there.

Videos and guides are an easy way of getting knowledge(Eric Sloof really is a big consumer of this approach) our there and an easy way to consume it. though it might to time consuming.


As a former customer and now an EMC'er I couldn't agree more - transparency is important. The only caveat is that different views of the "answer" are needed for different customer audiences. Giving an engineering response to a C Level individual isn't appropriate and will probably cause more confusion, by the same token giving a management response to an engineer won't answer the question. I have seen us shoot ourselves in the foot several times since I came on board a year ago by not ensuring communication is a) Clear b) Concise c) Consistent and d) in Context. A plethora of Powerpoint slides is usually not the answer the customer is looking for ;-)

Keith Paul

Awesome, Chad. I agree with you in theory about the limits with EMC ONE. You hint at the "Everywhere" communities on the EMC Community Network... We recently made all of the ECN indexed by Google, including support forums, but excluding sensitive IP or customer info. I bet there's a middle ground there, where we can totally have deep conversations around EMC tech, which over time becomes a type of KB for folks who haven't asked those questions yet.

Jim, your blog approach is spot-on too. In that model you're generating a personal brand of being helpful. We're lucky to have many folks doing this. But by supporting the ECN as a go-to source for this type of info will help transform EMC into a truly human and social brand.

We are indeed turning a ship, and I see it every day!

Chuck Hollis

Good discussion on variable risk when communicating technical information.

As a transmitter of information, I think the right mindset is "here is what we believe to be true, here is why we believe it to be true, if you need to use this information to make an important decision, please engage with us directly so we can provide more context".

But there is also a responsibility for the consumers of information as well.

Anyone consuming and using the information needs to understand that this was the best information available at a given time, things may have changed, your situation may be different, etc. -- and if an important decision is being made, make the effort to contact a subject matter expert for the lastest greatest.

When it comes to bad information events, there are two parties involved: the provider *and* the consumer. And, as long as both parties recognize their responsibilities, things are good.

At one time, we all did blogging disclosure statements. Maybe we need "technical information disclosure" statements?

-- Chuck

-- Chuck


Great dialogue, Another resource that might be beneficial where many of these types of conversations occur are on the EMC Community Network https://community.emc.com/community/connect/everything_vmware

I know there are other knowledge experts, vSpecialists and peers that regularly engage in similar topics...

Hope this helps

Travis F

Honesty and transparency are great policies unless you have something to hide.

It's important to make the data and dialogue public unless it reveals trade secrets. I recognize that you'll have negative experiences with public disclosure, but that means you need to do it well and develop appropriate guidelines and formats as you learn from experience. It doesn't mean it can't or shouldn't be done. In each of the examples you provided, it seems like things could done to avoid problems in the vast majority of circumstances. The pro's of the majority overshadow the occasional problem.

Be the leader, take a bold step, show us what it looks like to be open by default.

Customer considering EMC


We need to share information. there is no question about that. One critical issue to me is not whether to share or not. It is the many different places we put this information and where to look for it consistently. Blogs, Community Boards, Internal websites, twitter, Chatter, etc etc.
Just navigating through can be a frustrating experience in itself. This is why our partners, customers and employees require the Google model you mention above.

In addition, I personally see no delineation from a partner friendly post vs. an internal post. We are either on the same team or not. In my view, Our Partners have the right to educate our customers with the same information I have and not something less.

I also think a big part of the answer revolves around a culture change. We all need to take a different view than we may be used to, we should act as gatekeepers for disseminating information and be pro active about it. This includes not only the information itself but also who the SME might be. The SME should also hold almost nothing close and constantly be a broadcaster of information.

Craig McQuilkin

Chadster, old nickname from an old friend. You have been pushing the limits of openness since you walked through the doors into Commercial so many years back. It was a breath of fresh air then, and continues to be one. It's what people need and want. Keep on pushing.

iwan 'e1' Rahabok

Hi Chad, always enjoy the contrarian view, as I believe different isn't always better, but better is always different. I'm bookmarking this post and will share.
Sun went through a lot of thought to open source Solaris a few years back. Lots of fear, lots of unknown. Years after it's done, the good is far greater than the bad.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

  • BlogWithIntegrity.com


  • The opinions expressed here are my personal opinions. Content published here is not read or approved in advance by Dell Technologies and does not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Dell Technologies or any part of Dell Technologies. This is my blog, it is not an Dell Technologies blog.