« vShield App 5 Data Security = awesomesauce and free to try | Main | Raising the Bar V = vSphere 5! »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e552e53bd2883301538fd6e5c8970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference vSphere 5 edition of “Top 10 Reasons Why EMC for VMware”:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Hey Chad - this isn't entirely accurate. I saw this yesterday and didn't bother to read it given it's clearly just a bunch of meaningless "we do it all better than anyone" chest thumping.
That said, number 7 is wrong. EMC isn't the only vendor to support stretch clusters and in fact I'm sure you know that HP has our multi-site P4000 LeftHand SAN as the only HCL supported stretch cluster and has been for a few years. I wouldn't expect you're marketing guys to fix this but it would be the right thing to do versus the "Only EMC" posturing that is wrong.
(Obviously, I work for HP).
Posted by: twitter.com/HPStorageGuy | July 13, 2011 at 04:09 PM
Please reread item 7. It's entirely accurate. It is *not* making a claim on uniqueness of stretch clusters. I'm afraid you have misread the sentence. The uniqueness claim is with the storage federation in an active-active fashion (first clause of the sentence). That technology so happens to be helpful in stretch clustering (second clause of the sentence). The claim is about the storage federation capability.
Posted by: Michael Surratt | July 26, 2011 at 04:15 PM